|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBER Archive (2009)Subject: Re: [AMBER] array out of bound in Amber10 tests
From: David A. Case (case_at_biomaps.rutgers.edu)
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009, Shan-ho Tsai wrote:
This looks innocuous: try changing nmr.f, about line 4135, from
_REAL_ tgtvec(1) ! cuigl
to
_REAL_ tgtvec(*) ! cuigl
> (which is also -C for xlf90), and then several tests
Unfortunately, unless the compiler can generate additional information,
...dac
_______________________________________________
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|